From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sleemburg@it-functions.nl>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FA7063788
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:49:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2661724219
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:49:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx0.it-functions.nl (mx0.it-functions.nl [178.32.167.210])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
 SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 35B9F2420F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:49:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.100.26.194] (helo=daruma-old.hachimitsu.nl)
 by mx0.it-functions.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <sleemburg@it-functions.nl>)
 id 1kAThp-0003YU-Rg
 for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:49:22 +0200
Received: from [192.168.254.32] by daruma-old.hachimitsu.nl with esmtps
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <sleemburg@it-functions.nl>) id 1kAThn-0002KL-Fc
 for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:49:19 +0200
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <1494951154.2394588.1597820244987.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <a7cc597b-0327-a36b-ffe2-82553a334d55@it-functions.nl>
 <890410297.26903.1598340513251.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
From: Stephan Leemburg <sleemburg@it-functions.nl>
Organization: IT Functions
Message-ID: <1a863230-10d8-173d-e9ea-f5fffaff23e2@it-functions.nl>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:49:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <890410297.26903.1598340513251.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: nl
X-Scan-Signature: a605dcfc8bed8a9977d4330edb7e95d6
X-GeoIP: NL
X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav-new
X-Scan-Signature: 3c2fd75a5874318dfcf6c39b319d3556
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.142 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS        0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A            -2.25 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 T_SPF_PERMERROR          0.01 SPF: test of record failed (permerror)
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do
 test ?
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:49:23 -0000

On 25-08-2020 09:28, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> Thanks for the help
>
>>> What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production
>>> servers, then I think I can help you.
> I would like to do a lot of setup test, so I'll break your production ;)

Oh, that would not be good ;-)

> I'm going to test routed setup, but also bgp-evpn,etc...
> I have a friend working at ovh, I'll try to have some server to test.
Hopefully they will sponsor you.
> but thanks anyway.
>
You're welcome.
>>> They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failover
>>> of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it
>>> works.
> Interesting, you have failover le full /28 block between server ?
> If yes, do you have done it manually ? or through the api ?
> (In the future, I would like to implemented auto failover with keepalived/vrrp or something like that)

I did it manually through the control panel. I have only 2 servers at 
OVH, but at that moment 3 as I was migrating from an old one to a new one.

So, I tested migrating the whole block from the new one to the old one 
(so that one hat 2 /28 blocks after migration) and back.


>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Stephan Leemburg" <sleemburg@it-functions.nl>
> À: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
> Envoyé: Samedi 22 Août 2020 18:01:16
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do test ?
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> But actually, I do have 2 OVH based subscribed proxmox systems.
>
> They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failover
> of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it
> works.
>
> What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production
> servers, then I think I can help you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> Stephan Leemburg
> IT Functions
>
> e: sleemburg@it-functions.nl
> p: +31 (0)71 889 23 33
> m: +31(0)6 83 22 30 69
> kvk: 27313647
>
> On 19-08-2020 08:57, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently looking to test ip failover (single /32 ip or subnet range)
>> on public provider like hetzner or ovh.
>>
>> I have see a lot of users asking questions on the forum about routed setup.
>>
>> /32 is a bit tricky with point to point configuration,
>>
>> and I'll would like to implement them in sdn configuration (as I'm working on ip management).
>>
>>
>> I just need a small server, 1 single failover /32 ip and 1 small failover subnet.
>>
>>
>> If nobody can help, no problem, I'll rent a small server for 1 month.
>>
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> (BTW: I'll try to send a new sdn patch series next week, I'm currently working on ip dns api registration)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-devel mailing list
>> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel