From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466021FF0B1 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2026 02:45:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A71DE214D9; Fri, 09 Oct 2026 02:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <191ff335-1b22-4d84-b538-b0883ed22d27@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 02:45:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: applied: [PATCH container 1/2] pct: Remove experimental state from mknod To: Jonas Theisen , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20261002103653.96619-1-j.theisen@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20261002103653.96619-1-j.theisen@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1791506729158 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.605 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: BW7APYFJRNON5PD27LXFSGHM2YVKGV4C X-Message-ID-Hash: BW7APYFJRNON5PD27LXFSGHM2YVKGV4C X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 02/10/2026 12:37, Jonas Theisen wrote: > Remove the experimental warning on the mknod option. > As discussed off-list this feature is considered stable. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Theisen > --- > src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm > index 3eb1905..5c6804b 100644 > --- a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm > +++ b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm > @@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ my $features_desc = { > default => 0, > description => > "Allow unprivileged containers to use mknod() to add certain device nodes." > - . " This requires a kernel with seccomp trap to user space support (5.3 or newer)." > - . " This is experimental.", > + . " This requires a kernel with seccomp trap to user space support (5.3 or newer).", > }, > force_rw_sys => { > optional => 1,