From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA6911FF0B3 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 00:16:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B7C2021653; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 00:16:22 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Lucas Barros Subject: applied: [PATCH docs] fix #7852: pct: network: document limit of 32 interfaces Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 00:16:10 +0100 Message-ID: <179443896941.1827187.13968436719428202115.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261107222802.20526-1-lucasbarros.kam@gmail.com> References: <20261107222802.20526-1-lucasbarros.kam@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1794438979749 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.258 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 2LW3JPLUBFQG3YABJLROGXZ6D7J2BCGD X-Message-ID-Hash: 2LW3JPLUBFQG3YABJLROGXZ6D7J2BCGD X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, 07 Nov 2026 19:28:02 -0300, Lucas Barros wrote: > The maximum number of network interfaces of a container was raised from > 10 to 32 in pve-container and the web UI, but the documentation still > mentions the old limit and only lists the options up to 'net9'. > > Update the number and the option range, and fix the grammar of the > sentence introducing the list of settings while at it. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] fix #7852: pct: network: document limit of 32 interfaces commit: 3f9fbc189be60dc64c1213191cafee3fffa30981