From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1EA1FF0B3 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 23:36:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4F8C02161F; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 23:36:12 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= Subject: applied: (subset) [PATCH proxmox-backup] pbs-key-config: ensure password-protected key is long enough Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 23:36:02 +0100 Message-ID: <179443656021.1584081.13136710939327647302.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261105110750.805444-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> References: <20261105110750.805444-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1794436569648 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.263 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: BWN4H7GZUMFYMMYJBJSUS2LTVAVEY3M4 X-Message-ID-Hash: BWN4H7GZUMFYMMYJBJSUS2LTVAVEY3M4 X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 05 Nov 2026 12:07:25 +0100, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > while openssl fails if provided an empty slice, the resulting error message > points at the password instead of the key. checking for at least one byte of > data ensures plain and password-protected keys are distinguished. Applied, thanks! [1/1] pbs-key-config: ensure password-protected key is long enough commit: 17675dc28a31614acb62f4528cddd37a7276c4e3