From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F861FF0DF for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 12:09:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A523B2160E; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 12:09:22 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Robert Obkircher Subject: applied-series: [PATCH v1 proxmox-backup 0/8] fix warnings and rust edition incompatibilities Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 12:07:00 +0100 Message-ID: <179387681542.804336.6561367678999256416.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261103113054.184327-1-r.obkircher@proxmox.com> References: <20261103113054.184327-1-r.obkircher@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793876958173 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.501 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 27CWM6SN3FOMQU5PZ4VJ32M3GNLLF7CW X-Message-ID-Hash: 27CWM6SN3FOMQU5PZ4VJ32M3GNLLF7CW X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 03 Nov 2026 12:28:36 +0100, Robert Obkircher wrote: > Apply some clippy suggestions, prepare for a future edition upgrade, > and remove unused dependencies. > > To upgrade to the 2024 edition, we would still have to wrap some > std::env functions in unsafe, and review countless drop order warnings > reported by `cargo fix --edition`. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/8] tree-wide: fix clippy::useless_borrows_in_formatting commit: 83a0b93ea9b0ee0a8dd23662befabd0ae54121fe [2/8] tape: fix clippy::question_mark commit: 48798a6fded29d7a9a8bd7c7f7e5373c03bac31f [3/8] api: fix clippy::unnecessary_lazy_evaluations commit: f0a8b8fa500e5c1d09eceb4dd8156a48591f0350 [4/8] cargo: update minimum rust version to 1.91 commit: 20cfd9527eebfc5e5aca4ff45b0770ae04dc958d [5/8] tree-wide: mark extern blocks as unsafe and add some safety comments commit: 5fbcd3e6c68d125d1c5542ea9829a033ab2947be [6/8] tree-wide: remove redundant ref keyword in pattern matches commit: 8ce5f14a3061115366d37e72f15e7a66c51b6bef [7/8] tree-wide: add empty use<> bounds to return position impl traits commit: 18d546ffd08cb9d809f1746d9dfac7c76a0dac94 [8/8] cargo: remove unused dependencies commit: 1d13c56db3d1b212accb8d675429fe61e721c098 Best regards, -- Fabian Grünbichler