From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA721FF0DF for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 12:09:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7EFAF21571; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 12:09:19 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Christian Ebner Subject: applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] docs: mention restricted privileges required for local pull sync jobs Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 12:06:58 +0100 Message-ID: <179387681542.804336.16679263847876597384.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261019144649.382438-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20261019144649.382438-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793876956134 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.642 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: T4ABT2JXUSGUKDDL6VSGOIJWDR753RWR X-Message-ID-Hash: T4ABT2JXUSGUKDDL6VSGOIJWDR753RWR X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:46:49 +0200, Christian Ebner wrote: > Since commit c43aa6ac (""sync: pull: check source datastore/namespace > read access) stricter privilege checks are in place for users which > create/modify a pull sync job with local source. > > Mention these restrictions also in the documentation, and > discriminate more clearly between pull sync jobs with local and > remote source datastore. > > [...] Applied, but rephrased a bit more in a follow-up and copied it to the push part of the same file, thanks! [1/1] docs: mention restricted privileges required for local pull sync jobs commit: c7fe49614dcd18e7304b50a9f870f1543438dcf1 Best regards, -- Fabian Grünbichler