From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA821FF0F5 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2026 00:23:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D6B6321772; Tue, 03 Nov 2026 00:23:07 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Arthur Bied-Charreton Subject: applied: [PATCH pve-firewall 0/2] ebtables: fix ARP filter for alias and nomatch ipfilter entries Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 00:22:46 +0100 Message-ID: <179366176541.2144882.11221876376418277588.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261012093956.285433-1-a.bied-charreton@proxmox.com> References: <20261012093956.285433-1-a.bied-charreton@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793661783053 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.349 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: RWDCAJNVNY3NARGNT7FRIYTGS7HZV3FM X-Message-ID-Hash: RWDCAJNVNY3NARGNT7FRIYTGS7HZV3FM X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 11:38:06 +0200, Arthur Bied-Charreton wrote: > Following this forum post [0], I looked into what might be generating > the > > value does not look like a valid IP address or CIDR network > > log lines, which show up once per affected guest on every update cycle. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/2] firewall: ebtables: resolve aliases in ipfilter ipsets commit: 130f7bc8bdb4e91e103f6764057f79b8f85b46a8 [2/2] firewall: ebtables: honor nomatch in ipfilter ipsets commit: 162ae7ee95c500db433089768850dc54aa3b0270