From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067581FF0F5 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:52:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8AE6D21765; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:52:37 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, David Riley Subject: applied: [PATCH access-control/network v6 0/8] fix #7520: sdn: prune orphaned ACLs and handle VNet migrations Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 23:51:52 +0100 Message-ID: <179365989933.2007812.8207392472603374220.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260716104247.29047-1-d.riley@proxmox.com> References: <20260716104247.29047-1-d.riley@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793659954224 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.228 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 24LX2RJM57LKR2266OT3OURJMFNHHYX3 X-Message-ID-Hash: 24LX2RJM57LKR2266OT3OURJMFNHHYX3 X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:42:39 +0200, David Riley wrote: > Thanks @Stefan H. for the review and testing. > > Difference from v5: > * Use the running_config helper. > * Add a refactor commit for the compile_running_cfg to also use the > running_config helper. > * The comment for find_acl_tree_node_parent now uses the POD format. > * Remove 'use strict;' and 'use warning;' in the pruning and > migration test as this is implied by 'use v5.36' > * Update the warning message in the migration logic to reflect the > behaviour of the actual check. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [pve-access-control] applied to git/pve-access-control.git (master) [1/6] permission: add acl tree node parent lookup without node creation commit: c8cf60e4a507439ec395cb4d8782f3b4c32d5f23 [2/6] fix #7520: sdn: add pruning SDN resources ACLs commit: 1ccee88350f8d62cdb795f624d6e17bdfdb1164b [3/6] test: add sdn acl pruning tests commit: 6474d0910dcdd24f83e48d2d75cf37949bfb07c3 [4/6] permission: add helper to check for active permissions commit: a1e9f47871f3fea3991d2b0a80e05557ad788dfd [5/6] fix #7520: sdn: add VNet ACL migration commit: 8b4b22878922dd4121b3f102406d6a51d8744827 [6/6] test: add sdn acl migration tests commit: 7fbd23d09e2e19f05c559214afe73c4078dc705b [pve-network] applied to git/pve-network.git (master) [1/2] sdn: refactor compile_running_cfg to use running_config helper commit: 78eca6bb6ef85ab4fdaf4e53bce5970bc59fcecb [2/2] fix #7520: config: prune orphaned and relocate moved VNet ACLs commit: 802dc9cae7fc8704a30bcdf2c280cf51ef1d79a8