From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4022D1FF0F5
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:42:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 306BC2174F;
	Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:42:45 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Cole Hughes <c.hughes@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH docs/manager/network v2 0/3] remove ASN number
Date: Mon,  2 Nov 2026 23:42:29 +0100
Message-ID: <179365903859.1959341.4618794102829993962.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260905030730.24660-1-c.hughes@proxmox.com>
References: <20260905030730.24660-1-c.hughes@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793659359413
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.357 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: 2VL6UTBFGK4NUTOWMD2MR2UPS5K4NJB6
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2VL6UTBFGK4NUTOWMD2MR2UPS5K4NJB6
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:06:56 -0400, Cole Hughes wrote:
> ASN is the acronym of Autonomous System Number [0], it is therefore
> redundant to use "ASN #" or "ASN number". We should only use the
> following two forms of abbreviation: ASN(s) or AS number(s).
> 
> [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_system_(Internet)
> 
> Changes since v1:
> * commit messages: added line breaks at 70 characters
> * docs: use "multiple ASNs" instead of "multiple ASN"
> * docs: add missing 'a' in fabric section ("use a private ASN")
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[docs]
[1/1] sdn: removing ASN number
      commit: 22ed4e66f39c10cadeae0d8da4ad670e8d399a2f

[manager]
[1/1] sdn: removing ASN number
      commit: 22ed4e66f39c10cadeae0d8da4ad670e8d399a2f

[network]
[1/1] sdn: removing ASN number
      commit: 22ed4e66f39c10cadeae0d8da4ad670e8d399a2f