From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01B1B1FF0F5
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:02:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EB0D8217A5;
	Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:01:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH ve-rs] fix #8008: frr: make l2 route nexthop hostname
 optional
Date: Mon,  2 Nov 2026 23:01:29 +0100
Message-ID: <179365685579.1809735.1315959542286875464.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260904091747.73474-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
References: <20260904091747.73474-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793656904481
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.360 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: OKT5C447YWQHY5ZXO577Q43FD7PNOS5Z
X-Message-ID-Hash: OKT5C447YWQHY5ZXO577Q43FD7PNOS5Z
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri, 04 Sep 2026 11:17:45 +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> The hostname is optional, it is usually passed on BGP Open, but that
> doesn't have to be. Even though we always use the ip and not the
> hostname, this can make parsing fail.
> 
> See:
> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/blob/b8316e31cb8b7caeed43ce363b0616e15a2acf15/bgpd/bgp_vty.c#L14674
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] fix #8008: frr: make l2 route nexthop hostname optional
      commit: 402affd53d192f8727fdd56be86f487e7d9072c3