From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB4A1FF0FC for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 21:04:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8EE8A217AC; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 21:04:14 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Gabriel Goller Subject: applied: [PATCH ifupdown2] d/patches: don't fail vxlan syntax check on missing local tunnelip Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 21:03:30 +0100 Message-ID: <179364925011.1243978.16417124016847751620.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260914114918.144970-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> References: <20260914114918.144970-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793649847474 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.366 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: DJGCZPBN62EMQMHT4KO2X2V7BXRPBDKL X-Message-ID-Hash: DJGCZPBN62EMQMHT4KO2X2V7BXRPBDKL X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:49:02 +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote: > Don't fail the syntax check when no vxlan-local-tunnelip is configured. > This is fine, the local tunnelip can be retrieved from somewhere else. > Check the patch description for more info. > > We don't usually run `ifreload -s`, so the syntax check won't be run on > a normal apply. > > [...] Applied, thanks! Renumbered to 0017, as a new bond patch now takes 0016, fixed the weekday in the patch's Date header and reworded the paragraph about `ifreload -s` in the commit message. [1/1] d/patches: don't fail vxlan syntax check on missing local tunnelip commit: b88afe4db3fcb7e3f7361a383aeb6e95e04c37ce