From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282AE1FF0B3
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:07:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 30FEE213A6;
	Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:07:36 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH pve-network] sdn: vxlan: fix max value for vxlan-port
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:07:26 +0100
Message-ID: <179320004237.1372988.1816855913533390841.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260710060648.50963-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
References: <20260710060648.50963-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793200051809
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.494 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: HE65X6GFAPIJGUCV6HTPD4NOD3CUS5JX
X-Message-ID-Hash: HE65X6GFAPIJGUCV6HTPD4NOD3CUS5JX
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:06:48 +0200, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> As per RFC 768[1] the port is only 16 bits, so the maximum value is
> 65535. `ifupdown2` failed if 65536 was configured:
> 
> ```
> vxlan_yuuur : error: vxlan_yuuur: vxlan creation failed: 'H' format requires 0 <= number <= 65535
> yuuur : error: yuuur: bridge port vxlan_yuuur does not exist
> ```
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] sdn: vxlan: fix max value for vxlan-port
      commit: 68e6f98a6854f4751d4e9cab54e93e9efcd58f29