From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19AD61FF09C for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:04:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CED0C21635; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:04:02 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Hannes Laimer Subject: applied: [PATCH qemu-server] d/control: depend on pve-network instead of recommending it Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:03:52 +0200 Message-ID: <179240422594.366657.7520773185975003589.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261015081331.362373-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> References: <20261015081331.362373-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1792404238568 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.708 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: SMZ4ZGFG3OLKQ4VDUA3L6O7HJXGAANRH X-Message-ID-Hash: SMZ4ZGFG3OLKQ4VDUA3L6O7HJXGAANRH X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:13:31 +0200, Hannes Laimer wrote: > The SDN modules are loaded unconditionally, so qemu-server does not > work without pve-network, and pve-manager depends on it since commit > c3a5d35dbd67 ("d/control: change recommendation of pve-network > packages to hard dependency"). Declare the dependency. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] d/control: depend on pve-network instead of recommending it commit: 5bfbb3debfbf4446785c573467e559179199d566 Best regards, -- Fabian Grünbichler