From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 967801FF0AA
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:34:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 448DF21466;
	Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:34:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH] fix #7823: tape: don't set up a data-in transfer for
 non-data commands
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:34:34 +0200
Message-ID: <179010927039.4032217.6669723958191565211.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260817123128.2813924-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20260817123128.2813924-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1790109280822
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.765 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: PBVQSMPXNRMF2VYIX2EFJJ6OLZSBNHUG
X-Message-ID-Hash: PBVQSMPXNRMF2VYIX2EFJJ6OLZSBNHUG
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pbs-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pbs-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pbs-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:29:52 +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> do_command() required a transfer buffer of at least 16 bytes, so all
> commands without a data transfer phase (REWIND, SPACE, LOCATE, MOVE
> MEDIUM, ...) allocated a dummy buffer just to satisfy that check. Since
> create_scsi_pt_obj() hands any non-empty buffer to
> set_scsi_pt_data_in(), those commands announced a data-in transfer that
> they never fulfill.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] fix #7823: tape: don't set up a data-in transfer for non-data commands
      commit: 308ad7fa5442051adc44c56fe1d4a1084bdcaae0