From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DAFB1FF0AA for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:06:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CD65421548; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:06:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, =?UTF-8?q?Michael=20K=C3=B6ppl?= Subject: applied: [PATCH manager 1/1] cephx: rename 'consumer' to 'client' in output and comments Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:06:19 +0200 Message-ID: <179010757713.3892068.12417587822657240624.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260915145047.754765-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> References: <20260915145047.754765-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1790107586603 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.811 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 332GCDXLGJUVHXZZIYGERNAFBOHWU2WP X-Message-ID-Hash: 332GCDXLGJUVHXZZIYGERNAFBOHWU2WP X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:50:47 +0200, Michael Köppl wrote: > 'Client' is the term more often used in the Proxmox VE documentation and > 'consumer' has been replaced by 'client' in the Ceph documentation to > avoid confusion [0]. `pveceph auth status` and the cephx health hints in > the GUI still used the old 'consumer'. Update output strings and > comments accordingly. This change is made to conform to the updated > documentation and the naming change in the cephx migration script. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] cephx: rename 'consumer' to 'client' in output and comments https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=122efff25d77e86129d100fab73af1749195450c