From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8A281FF09F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:28:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C0F11214DE; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:28:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Wolfgang Bumiller To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Gabriel Goller Subject: applied: [PATCH container] lxc: debian: avoid 'inet6 auto' with debian's ifupdown2 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:28:01 +0200 Message-ID: <178963727096.139865.5058751115065452524.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260911095623.429947-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> References: <20260911095623.429947-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1789637282789 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.754 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: HJOWVETDHLXIJBOYAXPXEGNDX22R7UE5 X-Message-ID-Hash: HJOWVETDHLXIJBOYAXPXEGNDX22R7UE5 X-MailFrom: w.bumiller@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:56:21 +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote: > Debian's ifupdown2 (3.0.0-1.3 in bookworm and trixie) does not support > SLAAC and errors on the 'inet6 auto' stanza (Our ifupdown2 version has > SLAAC support though). > > Fall back to 'manual' if the container has an ifupdown2 version without > the 'auto' addon. SLAAC still works there, because the kernel manages > everything on its own with the default accept_ra and autoconf sysctls. > This is the same workaround we already use for Alpine, whose busybox > ifupdown has no 'auto' method either. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] lxc: debian: avoid 'inet6 auto' with debian's ifupdown2 commit: a728ceb749d3d120da08f536171601039f143044