From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167331FF09F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 03 Sep 2026 01:20:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C45912157C;
	Thu, 03 Sep 2026 01:20:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Erik Fastermann <e.fastermann@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] fix #7911: api: report: mark endpoint
 as protected
Date: Thu,  3 Sep 2026 01:19:55 +0200
Message-ID: <178839119423.1132707.9299604355367587381.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260811093611.228420-1-e.fastermann@proxmox.com>
References: <20260811093611.228420-1-e.fastermann@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1788391198124
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.912 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: 3JMC5IOZBS4274T6HKZUMYRK572PUK4B
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3JMC5IOZBS4274T6HKZUMYRK572PUK4B
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pbs-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pbs-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pbs-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 11:36:11 +0200, Erik Fastermann wrote:
> The report was generated by proxmox-backup-proxy, which runs as the
> unprivileged 'backup' user, so commands needing root only partly
> worked. ethtool printed "netlink error: Operation not permitted" to
> stderr, which ended up in the report. dmidecode and proxmox-boot-tool
> failed completely.
> 
> Forward the request to the privileged API daemon instead, like PVE,
> PMG and PDM already do. Users with Sys.Audit thus see slightly more
> host details, which the other products already accept.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] fix #7911: api: report: mark endpoint as protected
      commit: 82f2abe0f3182e26dd73ce65a30037fd6bd73f8d