From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08D931FF0C1
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 12:18:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 66D37213EB;
	Wed, 26 Aug 2026 12:18:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH pve-network] sdn: ipam: fix dual-stack per-MAC lookup
 in the PVE plugin
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 12:18:07 +0200
Message-ID: <178773948390.90473.1968730175265052191.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260824134244.1066515-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
References: <20260824134244.1066515-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1787739469952
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.805 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: JVBYIYZCE75NGCF6IQHGMJ6Z4SMZE4MW
X-Message-ID-Hash: JVBYIYZCE75NGCF6IQHGMJ6Z4SMZE4MW
X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:42:44 +0200, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> The subnet loop skipped every remaining subnet once a v6 address was
> found, dropping a v4 record living in a later subnet. Which subnet comes
> first is hash order, so in a dual-stack zone the v4 half of the answer
> went missing at random. The intended v4 short-circuit never fired
> either, since subnet keys are CIDR strings and ip_is_ipv4 returns false
> for those.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] sdn: ipam: fix dual-stack per-MAC lookup in the PVE plugin
      commit: ce388c5eec2376576d62a6be708439a64cf7fb62