From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F79D1FF0E5
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 17:28:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CB74920836;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2026 17:28:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH manager v2] ui: ceph: pool: set target ratio to 0
 when the value is not set
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 17:27:34 +0200
Message-ID: <178533884773.486238.11324475931100284609.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260729102628.276253-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
References: <20260729102628.276253-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1785338866680
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.169 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW        -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: LEVX55OFNU7NJZQ2PWJE4732FWHHMC7P
X-Message-ID-Hash: LEVX55OFNU7NJZQ2PWJE4732FWHHMC7P
X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:26:25 +0200, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote:
> Leaving the field empty in the web UI results in the parameter being dropped
> before the API call and the value remaining unchanged on the pool.
> 
> We address this by passing down target_size_ratio=0 to the API if the value is
> not explicitly set, this results in the key being unset on the pool.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] ui: ceph: pool: set target ratio to 0 when the value is not set
      commit: b0e5da32437ef28c1f08a89be83addf6e0382855