From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427321FF0E5 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:11:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AA29B21419; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:11:09 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stoiko Ivanov Subject: applied: [PATCH pmg-api] d/postinst: do not error out on chown/chmod /var/spool/pmg/ Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:10:11 +0200 Message-ID: <178412100047.1678796.13340561470527773108.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260622082137.2431-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> References: <20260622082137.2431-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1784121018059 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.189 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: GSKXJ35NHV4BX44E5XOCZZDBTP6GGI2V X-Message-ID-Hash: GSKXJ35NHV4BX44E5XOCZZDBTP6GGI2V X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:21:17 +0200, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > When /var/spool/pmg is a dedicated mountpoint on an unpriviledged > container, its `.lost+found` is not writeable by root inside the > container. > > In this case - it makes sense to not cause postinst to error-out, as > the failing change of mode/ownership is not problematic. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] d/postinst: do not error out on chown/chmod /var/spool/pmg/ commit: 138e1574d91ff91f32a8d14690e783f8a2913986 Best regards, -- Fabian Grünbichler