From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE9B71FF0E5 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:24:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E3C242148B; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:24:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Csapak To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Kefu Chai Subject: applied: [PATCH manager 1/1] ui: ceph: config db: auto-show MASK column when masks are in use Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:24:03 +0200 Message-ID: <178411821560.2916317.1206789773155876335.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260617115229.3763257-2-k.chai@proxmox.com> References: <20260617115229.3763257-2-k.chai@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.318 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: B4GV5BEBNUHY3VXW2S56VZB3ENFCJUJV X-Message-ID-Hash: B4GV5BEBNUHY3VXW2S56VZB3ENFCJUJV X-MailFrom: d.csapak@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 19:52:29 +0800, Kefu Chai wrote: > A mask narrows the scope of a config entry to a subset of daemons > matching a qualifier such as 'class:hdd' or 'host:node1'. Without it > visible, an entry set for 'osd/class:hdd' shows up as 'osd' in the > table, indistinguishable from a setting that applies to all OSDs. > > The MASK column existed since the table was introduced but was hidden > in f9bbe5fe to reduce noise: the field is empty for the vast majority > of entries on typical clusters. Exposing it unconditionally would add > an empty column for users who never set any masked options. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] ui: ceph: config db: auto-show MASK column when masks are in use commit: 9b929746e1ec593e1080c4d4893da6faf37f44f0