From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E6981FF0E4 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:54:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EADB5213D3; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:53:59 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Dominik Csapak Subject: applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] tape: workaround non-standard drive behavior for rewind Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:53:32 +0200 Message-ID: <178402620783.364806.3639573565454111413.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260701142703.3303408-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> References: <20260701142703.3303408-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1784026419250 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.232 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: CQ4NZG2VGOGXHYJQOXBQIQCOQTAYGPET X-Message-ID-Hash: CQ4NZG2VGOGXHYJQOXBQIQCOQTAYGPET X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:26:55 +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote: > When the media label needs to be read, e.g. when a tape is inserted in > the drive freshly, a REWIND (01h) command is sent to the drive with the IMMED > bit set to 0, which means that the command should only return after the > rewind is finished. > > For some drives, it seems that this is not the case and that some report > a 'rewind operation in progress' (ASC 0x00, ASCQ 0x1A) even after the > rewind command should be finished. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] tape: workaround non-standard drive behavior for rewind commit: a85064d6a700d54adacb112566f7856832cbd375 Best regards, -- Fabian Grünbichler