From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A75DB1FF183 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:28:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF77C15CF3; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:30:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <177f7d36-ec20-4410-a539-82ea0e64d4d5@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:29:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stefan Hanreich References: <20250730163910.412108-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20250730163910.412108-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753896559703 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH ifupdown2 1/1] d/patches: fix issue when reloading bonds with altname slaves X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 30.07.25 um 18:39 schrieb Stefan Hanreich: > Might want to hold off on applying this one until Christoph could take > a closer look. While I couldn't find issues with bridge_ports and VLAN > devices in my tests, both modules also use parse_port_list so I think > a closer look is warranted as well for those invocations. This solves > the bond issue on my test node at least. I definitively think so too that a closer look would be great, if we got access to the nlcache in the modulebase for addons it might be good to translate there, OTOH. Anyway, this seems straight forward enough and fixes the reproducer, so I'll still apply it now, we can improve this tomorrow, if needed. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel