From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776281FF13F for ; Thu, 21 May 2026 11:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B4186C37D; Thu, 21 May 2026 11:03:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= Subject: applied: [PATCH docs 1/2] faq: make EOL description more explicit Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 11:03:00 +0200 Message-ID: <177935417679.1656571.7882334216503945025.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260521090007.320100-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> References: <20260521090007.320100-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779354171834 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: SO6JG3H2HZGBOKCXOSSSUKLBLU7DSWZN X-Message-ID-Hash: SO6JG3H2HZGBOKCXOSSSUKLBLU7DSWZN X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 21 May 2026 10:57:59 +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > instead of just "supported", which has been misinterpreted in the past, make > the regular security team to LTS part more explicit. Applied, thanks! [1/2] faq: make EOL description more explicit commit: d76dfc7f92e70e6615391c0f960732c379d1aa99 [2/2] faq: eol: fix Bookworm EOL date commit: dc6581bf81257af3841c9686c136db7475b1dd01