From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C78441FF13B
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 20 May 2026 04:49:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B124A1485C;
	Wed, 20 May 2026 04:49:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH network] sdn: fabrics: split WireGuard endpoint port
 field
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 04:49:08 +0200
Message-ID: <177924488337.3424454.15038583746519423983.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260519190645.265484-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
References: <20260519190645.265484-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779245340886
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: 3OH6OS7KFELVGPKXEICT2W3T7ZKJDGIM
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3OH6OS7KFELVGPKXEICT2W3T7ZKJDGIM
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Tue, 19 May 2026 21:06:32 +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> Expose the WireGuard endpoint port as a separate optional field in the
> node edit window, defaulting to the standard WireGuard port 51820.
> 
> Keep the API representation unchanged by splitting endpoint host and
> port on load, and combining them again on submit. Wrap IPv6 addresses in
> brackets when adding the port.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] sdn: fabrics: split WireGuard endpoint port field
      commit: 987b6b6914d31f2482cd52954eb0dc640abc5cbb