From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F1B1FF136 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 12:22:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 564C9A2C5; Mon, 18 May 2026 12:22:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Hannes Laimer Subject: Re: [PATCH network v2 0/4] sdn: evpn: IPv6 underlay support Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 12:20:38 +0200 Message-ID: <177909919143.3110381.3763965075645409286.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260515110648.217493-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> References: <20260515110648.217493-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779099759894 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 3W32ZIERBI3LYAMGIQWCUTYJQ2GU7DP7 X-Message-ID-Hash: 3W32ZIERBI3LYAMGIQWCUTYJQ2GU7DP7 X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 15 May 2026 13:06:44 +0200, Hannes Laimer wrote: > After we bumped frr this will work now, so rebased it and sent it again. Adds > IPv6 underlay support for EVPN: IPv6-capable underlays can be selected and IPv6 > peers configured. On a dual-stack underlay the EVPN session picks IPv6. > > I mostly tested this on top of the bgp-fabric series[2], but it does not depend > on the changes in the that series. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/4] sdn: evpn: prepare IPv6 underlay support commit: fbf93d81818645406fcbadba7723e57b1a5858fc [2/4] sdn: evpn: keep router-id valid on IPv6 underlay commit: fa20a4091a92e62236d6462ead2e03423e70eb6b [3/4] sdn: stabilize peer IP ordering when generating sdn config commit: a22cf9eeeb529c3eb4821e710e237bd6516ded7e [4/4] sdn: evpn: add tests covering ipv6 underlays commit: 0e99f82b30c63c1bd8c305dbd7006c3c8af2febf