From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E441FF136 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 11:41:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 00CAF8569; Mon, 18 May 2026 11:41:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Manuel Federanko Subject: applied: [PATCH docs v2] pve-firewall: link to implicit rules section. Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 11:37:50 +0200 Message-ID: <177909706851.3039270.2367134545413055281.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260505112049.52552-1-m.federanko@proxmox.com> References: <20260505112049.52552-1-m.federanko@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779097259807 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: WPDWXAE4MDGAC22ZMJQTVKHT3DVWO6CJ X-Message-ID-Hash: WPDWXAE4MDGAC22ZMJQTVKHT3DVWO6CJ X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 05 May 2026 13:20:49 +0200, Manuel Federanko wrote: > Updated the documentation note to link to the default rules. > Also added a section directing users to the macro system if they need > additional rules. > > Add a note to the Ceph section that the firewall has to be configured, > if it is enabled. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] pve-firewall: link to implicit rules section. commit: 8c9f57835e675258906598ef8f601b54e81348c8