From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D861FF13A for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 05:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8E4A035B30; Wed, 13 May 2026 05:09:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Lukas Sichert Subject: applied: [PATCH network v2] tests: use valid ipv6 snat data for sdn config generation Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 05:08:17 +0200 Message-ID: <177864169610.4078454.15640186505139384592.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260507144717.80160-1-l.sichert@proxmox.com> References: <20260507144717.80160-1-l.sichert@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778641597344 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: ZZH6HIJK6ZATGAXGLDO4Y6H3Z2ACKDGU X-Message-ID-Hash: ZZH6HIJK6ZATGAXGLDO4Y6H3Z2ACKDGU X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 07 May 2026 16:47:15 +0200, Lukas Sichert wrote: > It is not possible to NAT ipv6 to ipv4. Rules like > 'ip6tables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s '2a08:2142:302:3::/64' -o vmbr0 -j > SNAT --to-source 10.0.1.10' > fail with: > 'Bad IP address "10.0.1.10"' > On a real system, the outgoing interface is resolved via 'ip route get > 2001:4860:4860::8888'. 'ip route get' cannot output an > ipv4 address if querying for an ipv6 address. If the 'ip route get' > query is executed without an ipv6 address configured, the query fails. > However, the simulated wrapper function currently returns '(vmbr0, > 192.168.0.1)'. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] tests: use valid ipv6 snat data for sdn config generation commit: 0e93afc970a8f29e98c93e9b4989f2caf582e5d5