From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A7A1FF13C
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:37:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0929E1498B;
	Thu,  2 Apr 2026 13:37:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Shan Shaji <s.shaji@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH proxmox_dart_api_client 1/1] fix: cleanup: dart
 analysis issues found by dart linter
Date: Thu,  2 Apr 2026 13:37:39 +0200
Message-ID: <177512979589.2426970.9411523956747356829.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260306143530.113174-2-s.shaji@proxmox.com>
References: <20260306143530.113174-1-s.shaji@proxmox.com>
 <20260306143530.113174-2-s.shaji@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                    -1.454 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	KAM_SHORT               0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED      1 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED      1 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED      1 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: F3BVBMSF4ARF452XJ6VRD32RSKS2JQM5
X-Message-ID-Hash: F3BVBMSF4ARF452XJ6VRD32RSKS2JQM5
X-MailFrom: d.csapak@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri, 06 Mar 2026 15:35:29 +0100, Shan Shaji wrote:
> The library name is not necessary anymore [0]. Removed the same
> and updated the doc comments. Additionaly, added explicit types
> for variables as suggested by the dart linter (lints) [1][2].
> 
> [0] - https://dart.dev/tools/linter-rules/unnecessary_library_name
> [1] - https://dart.dev/tools/linter-rules/prefer_typing_uninitialized_variables
> [2] - https://dart.dev/tools/linter-rules/strict_top_level_inference
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] fix: cleanup: dart analysis issues found by dart linter
      commit: 5258fd14c908306a237f5242ef965d7fdb9d3bda