From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5DC11FF137 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 20:40:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 881994F45; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 20:41:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Fiona Ebner Subject: applied: [PATCH qemu-server] migration: print netdevice: only warn about missing host_mtu setting when unexpected Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 20:41:02 +0200 Message-ID: <177498241310.240157.7282907806521651834.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260331144738.856141-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20260331144738.856141-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1774982411937 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: UWZZT4JO6AY5BNCUIVK26VHADCIDJTOQ X-Message-ID-Hash: UWZZT4JO6AY5BNCUIVK26VHADCIDJTOQ X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:46:03 +0200, Fiona Ebner wrote: > When the machine version is less than 10.0+pve1 and the MTU is 1500, > not having the host_mtu parameter is fully expected. Only log when the > missing host_mtu setting is not expected to avoid confusion. Reported > in the community forum [0]. > > [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/182156/ > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] migration: print netdevice: only warn about missing host_mtu setting when unexpected commit: 359712a70837fc1e9854af8c02c504ee7a52e24c