From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBEEA1FF138
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:33:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A4E1C3C99;
	Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:34:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Subject: partially-applied: [PATCH-SERIES cluster v2 0/2] cfs lock: small
 improvements
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:33:49 +0100
Message-ID: <177143961735.4093791.9170054059025936239.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260218154438.184685-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20260218154438.184685-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1771439639913
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                    -0.020 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: 453YPEFRY5VGSTIJ7RPVSVJD6FUWJVND
X-Message-ID-Hash: 453YPEFRY5VGSTIJ7RPVSVJD6FUWJVND
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:44:28 +0100, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Changes in v2:
> * Add patch to improve how signals are handled.
> 
> Because of a recent report in the forum [0], I wanted to ping the v1
> of the submission [1], which could've helped in this case.
> 
> During re-testing, I ran into another issue and noticed that signals
> are not nicely handled yet, so there is a second patch now :)
> 
> [...]

Applied the first one for now, thanks!

[1/2] cfs lock: attempt to acquire lock more frequently
      commit: 13a71af58bd3ecad3be9b960ae12e3de6343585c