From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 303321FF142 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 20:22:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C5C9D17487; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 20:23:47 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Kefu Chai Subject: applied: [PATCH manager v2] ui: ceph: use record sizes in Ceph pool edit dialog Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 20:23:36 +0100 Message-ID: <177126981378.1794558.3847467609997958733.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260129145253.110677-2-k.chai@proxmox.com> References: <20260129144255.108808-2-k.chai@proxmox.com> <20260129145253.110677-2-k.chai@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1771269816469 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.020 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: WKKWLO25NMWDK6ORCR4GVBTFTUWDJLXQ X-Message-ID-Hash: WKKWLO25NMWDK6ORCR4GVBTFTUWDJLXQ X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Kefu Chai X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 22:52:54 +0800, Kefu Chai wrote: > When editing Ceph pools via the GUI, the edit dialog displays incorrect > Size and Min Size values that don't match the pool overview table. This > can lead to accidental data loss if users save the pool configuration > without noticing the discrepancy. > > Root Cause: > The run_editor function creates the PVE.Ceph.PoolEdit dialog but fails > to pass the actual size and min_size values from the grid record. This > causes a race condition where: > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] ui: ceph: use record sizes in Ceph pool edit dialog commit: 3936276e2241b07a9546747e2ff2a91b4502c429