From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 773601FF141 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:35:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6DDE135F14; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:36:34 +0100 (CET) From: Dominik Csapak To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Lukas Sichert Subject: applied: [PATCH proxmox-widget-toolkit v2] fix #4911: ui: network edit: allow empty bond-primary Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:35:49 +0100 Message-ID: <177097875589.2158739.14840245432985055513.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260210101343.20820-1-l.sichert@proxmox.com> References: <20260210101343.20820-1-l.sichert@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: FLRXIQJHHCJTS4TKBFV2U2WZTXKR3CU5 X-Message-ID-Hash: FLRXIQJHHCJTS4TKBFV2U2WZTXKR3CU5 X-MailFrom: d.csapak@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 11:13:43 +0100, Lukas Sichert wrote: > Currently, when creating an active-backup bond, the bond-primary field > cannot be left blank, even though this value is optional in the backend. > If no value is set in the frontend, it sends the value '' to the > backend. There, it is interpreted as the name of an interface, which is > incorrect. This results in the error 'bond-primary: invalid format - > invalid network interface name '' ' being displayed. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] fix #4911: ui: network edit: allow empty bond-primary commit: 5e77066c82edd127aca60b388910dced8620d604