From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF9EC1FF178 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 03:55:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A2D0EFB4D; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 03:55:49 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Lukas Wagner Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 03:55:11 +0100 Message-ID: <176455772230.2632751.6044584611711531244.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20251127104447.162951-7-l.wagner@proxmox.com> References: <20251127104447.162951-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <20251127104447.162951-7-l.wagner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1764557703685 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pdm-devel] applied: [PATCH datacenter-manager 01/13] pdm-api-types: reuse APTUpdateInfo from proxmox_apt_api_types X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 11:44:35 +0100, Lukas Wagner wrote: > ... instead of defining of defining our own version locally. > Both structs are equivalent, with the exception of `change_log_url`, > which was present in the pdm-api-types version but not in the struct > definition in proxmox-apt-api-types. We never seem to use this member > (grepped PBS as well as PDM source), so it should be fine to use the > definition without it - it also still compiles fine. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [01/13] pdm-api-types: reuse APTUpdateInfo from proxmox_apt_api_types commit: f70e1ad6ba5e90146dd6bc603ec4631cf188d5bc _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel