From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8B51FF165 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:33:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9609639354; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:35:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Christian Ebner Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:34:31 +0200 Message-ID: <175396166927.943348.2726142111644567603.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 In-Reply-To: <20250731113015.148881-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20250731113015.148881-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753961675818 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [pmg-devel] [PATCH proxmox-widget-toolkit] network edit: fix hiding of altnames field if disabled by config X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:30:15 +0200, Christian Ebner wrote: > Commit 691f530d ("network: optionally show alternative interface > names") introduced the optional altnames field in the network edit > grid. The chosen default configuration however does not even add the > field, therefore setting it to hidden if no altnames data is present > cannot work. > > Fix this by only hiding the field if it was actually configured to be > shown in the first place. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] network edit: fix hiding of altnames field if disabled by config commit: c3bb1497d7f1605a2fe04e89a42a38c0292d8741 _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1D51FF165 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:33:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2E03139415; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:35:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Christian Ebner Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:34:31 +0200 Message-ID: <175396166927.943348.2726142111644567603.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 In-Reply-To: <20250731113015.148881-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20250731113015.148881-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753961675818 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [pmg-devel] [PATCH proxmox-widget-toolkit] network edit: fix hiding of altnames field if disabled by config X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:30:15 +0200, Christian Ebner wrote: > Commit 691f530d ("network: optionally show alternative interface > names") introduced the optional altnames field in the network edit > grid. The chosen default configuration however does not even add the > field, therefore setting it to hidden if no altnames data is present > cannot work. > > Fix this by only hiding the field if it was actually configured to be > shown in the first place. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] network edit: fix hiding of altnames field if disabled by config commit: c3bb1497d7f1605a2fe04e89a42a38c0292d8741 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C9A1FF165 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:33:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E73D839370; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:35:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Christian Ebner Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:34:31 +0200 Message-ID: <175396166927.943348.2726142111644567603.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 In-Reply-To: <20250731113015.148881-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20250731113015.148881-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753961675818 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pmg-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-widget-toolkit] network edit: fix hiding of altnames field if disabled by config X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pmg-devel" On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 13:30:15 +0200, Christian Ebner wrote: > Commit 691f530d ("network: optionally show alternative interface > names") introduced the optional altnames field in the network edit > grid. The chosen default configuration however does not even add the > field, therefore setting it to hidden if no altnames data is present > cannot work. > > Fix this by only hiding the field if it was actually configured to be > shown in the first place. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] network edit: fix hiding of altnames field if disabled by config commit: c3bb1497d7f1605a2fe04e89a42a38c0292d8741 _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel