From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED18D1FF165 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 09:18:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8A94033E86; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 09:20:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Friedrich Weber Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 09:20:05 +0200 Message-ID: <175394639682.545443.12653711389066340381.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 In-Reply-To: <20250731071306.11777-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> References: <20250731071306.11777-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753946403666 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH storage] plugin: lvm: volume snapshot info: untaint snapshot filename X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 09:13:02 +0200, Friedrich Weber wrote: > Without untainting, offline-deleting a volume-chain snapshot on an LVM > storage via the GUI can fail with an "Insecure dependecy in exec > [...]" error, because volume_snapshot_delete uses the filename its > qemu-img invocation. > > Commit 93f0dfb ("plugin: volume snapshot info: untaint snapshot > filename") fixed this already for the volume_snapshot_info > implementation of the Plugin base class, but missed that the LVM > plugin overrides the method and was still missing the untaint. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] plugin: lvm: volume snapshot info: untaint snapshot filename commit: 92efe5c6cb9904ebf7bbb7f8d690ac80e7c91e23 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel