From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693BC1FF15C for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 468B61837D; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:47:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:46:47 +0200 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: Adam Kalisz , pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <2ac072513fdb726fd0e22fbc79425537dcf63a41.camel@notnullmakers.com> In-Reply-To: <2ac072513fdb726fd0e22fbc79425537dcf63a41.camel@notnullmakers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.16.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1753447301.win4nv1cia.astroid@yuna.none> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753447607250 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.047 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Chunk verification speedup discussion, similar speedup opportunities elsewhere X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" On July 25, 2025 1:23 pm, Adam Kalisz wrote: > Hi list, > > I missed whether the chunk verification speedup when loading chunks got > applied or whether it was somehow included in the S3-like storage > option change set. https://lore.proxmox.com/pbs-devel/20250707132706.2854973-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com/ hasn't been applied (and probably needs a rebase post-S3 ;)) > In > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/abysmally-slow-restore-from-backup.133602/page-7 > we have discussed some other opportunities for speedup using similar > patterns. People mentioned LXC container restore speed and host-based > backup restore, which looking at the code for the latter seems like a > similar async loop pattern would bring some improvement without too > much trouble: > > https://github.com/proxmox/proxmox-backup/blob/4940514b0f05d6cd6a5f711edfdd47c1fa41b537/proxmox-backup-client/src/main.rs#L1109 that's not the code path for container/host backups, that's the code path for fixed-size indices like vm backups, but just dumping to a file instead of via qmrestore.. i.e., nothing that is used by PVE or users usually, but can still be improved of course ;) > Similarly the sync performance between two Proxmox Backup Servers and > live-migration got mentioned in various places. do you mean live-restore here? live migration has nothing to do with PBS.. _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel