From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F6D1FF17C for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:45:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB88C1A103; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:47:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stoiko Ivanov Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:46:52 +0200 Message-ID: <175329641067.3914087.15212221149613185805.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 In-Reply-To: <20250723181453.1082366-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> References: <20250723181453.1082366-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753296420590 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH zfsonlinux] cherry-pick fix for overgrown dnode cache X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:14:53 +0200, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > the following patch seems applicable and might fix an issue observed > in our enterprise support a while ago. containers run in their own > cgroups, thus were probably not scanned by the kernel shrinker - this > resulted in Dnode cache numbers of 300+% reported in arc_summary. > > FWICT the issue was introduced in ZFS 2.2.7 > (commit 5f73630e9cbea5efa23d16809f06e0d08523b241 see: > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/17052#issuecomment-3065907783) > but I assume that the increase of zfs_arc_max by default makes it > trigger OOMs far easier. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] cherry-pick fix for overgrown dnode cache commit: 595cc7bfa112771dc7db257b885677ee057f0d6b _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel