From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel@firewall-services.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96724779BE
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:58:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7DEC8EDF7
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pmg.fws.fr (pmg.fws.fr [51.91.175.36])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 50D3FEDEC
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pmg.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by pmg.fws.fr (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7E1BEC47BF
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:57:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (zmproxy.fws.fr [10.29.1.17])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by pmg.fws.fr (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 81591C01BE
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2F78B4FCA;
 Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57A1D8B4FCB;
 Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmproxy.fws.fr 57A1D8B4FCB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=firewall-services.com; s=7DAD15A2-D84A-11E9-8F77-BEC4FAA34EBC;
 t=1619614647; bh=5PONU3y3bH5NXgEZ/sqEwVQXutdoCrvtIj1S+OSWZIY=;
 h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version;
 b=ArpFKMmM8zgJ9UI5nOhsCc1u6SDUHGeRO7gkxwqNXRxHLCsSh/iB5Oe1rG7k/2qpc
 Ej4bIL2NH0lszRkZArC3lpyr1ZjyMx3PCxZtRV9XX1jiGurLQiHF/ZQnN8+Tp5eNcr
 n6SYCOb+ev87GWmeHS+CVVvJSNqRNIkXb5mANZuqd8EEYO7RUXnTizlZQVUqttd7o1
 HRSQLbckEYW60NLRVRGs7u652MOpWDyQtzers1ik/5/pLYj5u4UYGzJQrPmVZZYBfL
 ED5qV/MJRrqv9jdt4Pj2sQGiZThtNaLBsK0CbEZnn4YpFixPn1FzHZdYtQydE+Kt2U
 xHPcwRWWNfcjQ==
Received: from zmstore.fws.fr (zmstore.fws.fr [10.29.3.15])
 by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F358B4FCA
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Berteaud <daniel@firewall-services.com>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <1733391914.5223.1619614647243.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr>
In-Reply-To: <CAOKSTBsDkSkDsOGyGrmnLHwNf27j_=ZBPusrvFkJwd=C7oo_qw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <299675699.4847.1619611819855.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr>
 <47334094.5067.1619613578451.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr>
 <CAOKSTBsDkSkDsOGyGrmnLHwNf27j_=ZBPusrvFkJwd=C7oo_qw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.7.101]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4018 (ZimbraWebClient - GC89 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4026)
Thread-Topic: SDN issues in 6.4
Thread-Index: Uu98yrJRJOizI1pCu7JDs1MhprsgKg==
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.212 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] SDN issues in 6.4
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:58:00 -0000

----- Le 28 Avr 21, =C3=A0 14:50, Gilberto Ferreira gilberto.nunes32@gmail.=
com a =C3=A9crit :

> Just curious: did you restart the upgraded nodes?

Yes, of course ;-)

--=20
[ https://www.firewall-services.com/ ] =09
Daniel Berteaud=20
FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS, La s=C3=A9curit=C3=A9 des r=C3=A9seaux=20
Soci=C3=A9t=C3=A9 de Services en Logiciels Libres=20
T=C3=A9l : +33.5 56 64 15 32=20
Matrix: @dani:fws.fr=20
[ https://www.firewall-services.com/ | https://www.firewall-services.com ]