From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19B077DFBB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  9 Nov 2021 18:40:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0649F11F00
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  9 Nov 2021 18:40:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D33CA11EF4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  9 Nov 2021 18:40:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A1BB242775
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  9 Nov 2021 18:40:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 18:39:54 +0100
From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20211109120742.3276270-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
 <c7978044-4902-4e06-5cdd-e12151a7504f@proxmox.com>
 <1636462429.jx5l91kxvj.astroid@nora.none>
 <13da5c88-d4f5-a6e2-0ccc-be770c8dd1d8@binovo.es>
In-Reply-To: <13da5c88-d4f5-a6e2-0ccc-be770c8dd1d8@binovo.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid)
Message-Id: <1636479570.eo9tdu1qo5.astroid@nora.none>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.286 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH corosync-pve/kronosnet 0/4]
 cherry-pick bug fixes
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 17:40:32 -0000

On November 9, 2021 2:21 pm, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Nice to see this here, I think we have been afected by this for the past=20
> weeks (since we upgraded to PVE 7...); I was starting to think we had=20
> faulty network :)
>=20
> How can I know when this gets to community repo?
>=20
> Thanks

it's available on pvetest already