From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D88169BED for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:54:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EEF4C214CB for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:53:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E3546214B5 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:53:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B446044E1C for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:53:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 08:53:31 +0100 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <CAJ-Uffn1eVivrsxHxVJJjoUp-gJue0BHZ9coYACTssQBaoK+vQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Uffk_gWE9yqFQBn8WzRKf93hu_GtHoraoBj_gLDQNLKTqSw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Uffk_gWE9yqFQBn8WzRKf93hu_GtHoraoBj_gLDQNLKTqSw@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1607327433.kteohg3dea.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.226 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Compiling PBS on arm64 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 07:54:10 -0000 On December 6, 2020 8:41 pm, Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski wrote: > I'm slightly progressing, but I stumbled across some `debcargo` problem. = It > appears that > Proxmox uses their own fork of `debcargo`, which is needed in order to > build crates > without the usage of crates.io. Is this patch published somewhere? >=20 > rust-debcargo (2.4.2-pve1) proxmox-rust; urgency=3Dmedium >=20 > * allow overriding maintainer via debcargo.toml > * implement local crate support.patch >=20 > -- Proxmox Support Team <support@proxmox.com> Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:13:48 > +0100 https://git.proxmox.com/?p=3Ddebcargo-conf.git;a=3Dtree;f=3Dsrc/debcargo/de= bian/patches;h=3D7345cadea4cbffc3174c04e34960e91767892100;hb=3Drefs/heads/p= roxmox/buster all of the toolchain backports are published as well on=20 git.proxmox.com.. if you want to re-compile all of our devel repo for=20 arm64, I suggest familiarizing yourself with debcargo and the=20 debcargo-conf repo (especially the upstream and Proxmox readmes) ;) > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski <ayufan@ayufan.eu> wr= ote: >=20 >> ARM64 is becoming increasingly popular, especially that PBS seems at lea= st >> for my usage-pattern to be ideal to run on my arm64 NAS. In the end >> I want to try to be able to recompile everything for arm64 and see how >> nicely >> it works there. >> >> But first I decided to try to compile all packages for `amd64`. And I'm >> scratching my head >> to try to do that. This proves to be super hard due to multitude of >> dependencies that are backported, >> unordered, and require a very special set of commands to be executed >> depending on a git repo >> since PBS is rust-based. >> >> Do you maybe happen to have a comprehensive guide that allows you to >> compile everything >> from the scratch without the use of `/devel` repo, ideally with some kin= d >> of CI scripts that would do this heavy lifting? >> >> Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >=20 =