From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62F4E60837 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:10:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5A9C711907 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:10:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EE545118F9 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:10:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id w202so1725774pff.10 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:10:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=8z5j12a8f0YeBFDnPln+q6xFEHkjNXCwdjApYHdR5fM=; b=pVKC8aaULxUIr3/V8OaPnXHabz6D1f/gUb5KuNlOjdZjjUZA1WuJ4ablXJ4tOyADfI Pw7vcLf3E9SSL0MAGqxTNNYLm9e7WKfqeNXZh0Jzf9wi7Zcw+1ncZ50l8ToM8U8zrdz3 jytqgoz68EXwrkR4S7KRrMU6GDKjrtXUu4t6cwGjdsHx0Nlyvymq+ZegMGu8/eLJMB6c cg9OeJ1nz4ckoFN++dx4l5Lor1Tr/4G5UMI+sJucWibEnUCJLFXn2rR0oePhNcCtIX/S 1ir/mQ8vYOCw9oQjHX0M+Qdrrj+GhBqgDW6Ald7Pwj/05Vut2DE5dEVt1OnXmk8BTByh 9rxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=8z5j12a8f0YeBFDnPln+q6xFEHkjNXCwdjApYHdR5fM=; b=CTqkdaRqHw44lEjGoIpgw2bOHfHmbsb4ZwJv4Y4Ds95cFL6AFQfcVAyWpoffNSqUhk c8z2gavl+fnhwEM29zNCeuoKznB3Vj5fofpokN7cDH3bgVUtrb/58qeGmjqx/0jbmzgy gW414SwAP/zmieF2F3euqpl859LvNxHWgI4NcxnAB3jkJeSJ4AvY6ExmGZkrzNk7Vu7j Cx4+ipCrctG2/g5lO/j4LN4dEUBF/NyZ/LLj503sV19mhyQ7Nm4QcdjsNb7QFq2fJZpo Q6kzjRaAW5TNaotLw3TJw2CZ6yu6giQb3WaTmKSaLUcFyz07JIylBcFSIo5i2gCW0Di5 x68A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vunTVlB2RrOCOoDQuDFX3pQ8m84wywWcNcJ+/g/yclFZ/K3OJ LbRck5zq3LleHN6YuKIYBurOQMN2MCCEVw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrPdKOnTpytLcRmNynyspo2qNbPx+g7OKMyPXONv1l36EQjcb09qSvw5ax0KIpg63nobT5Xg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8402:: with SMTP id j2mr3988745pjn.120.1606399824757; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r7sm6760394pjd.8.2020.11.26.06.10.22 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:10:23 -0800 (PST) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com> From: Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com> Message-ID: <15f5893d-83cf-ee8c-11ff-0a67e376dc41@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:10:14 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.038 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Caution: ceph-mon service does not start after today's updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:10:33 -0000 On 26/11/2020 10:18 pm, Uwe Sauter wrote: > this is a warning for all that are eager to apply today's updates. > In my case the ceph-mon@<host> service did not start after a reboot which caused a hanging Ceph once the second monitoring service > went offline. I ran into that, also the node failed to rejoin the cluster quorum. syslog had errors relating to the pem-ssl key. Manually start the pve cluster service and a 2nd reboot solved both issues. -- Lindsay