From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096A31FF398
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 May 2024 13:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B5917143;
	Mon, 27 May 2024 13:05:41 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <15af5b0d-05a3-4d89-b8f3-d1788ea38c28@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 13:05:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20240514103421.289431-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20240514103421.289431-62-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <40542da1-4552-477e-8880-02f2d1eff904@proxmox.com>
 <787720807.679.1716459433622@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <b8cab5a5-7d4f-4c0f-8d41-a8333fca4e28@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US, de-DE
From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <b8cab5a5-7d4f-4c0f-8d41-a8333fca4e28@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v6 proxmox-backup 61/65] client: pxar: add
 archive creation with reference test
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 5/23/24 12:17, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> On 5/23/24 12:17, Christian Ebner wrote:
>>
>>> On 23.05.2024 12:04 CEST Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> interestingly this test runs through
>>>
>>> but if do
>>>
>>> ./target/debug/pxar list ./tests/pxar/backup-client-pxar-expected.mpxar
>>>
>>> i get the following error:
>>>
>>> "/"
>>> "/"
>>> "/"
>>> "/folder_0"
>>> "/folder_0/file_0"
>>> Error: unexpected entry type: UNKNOWN header (ef00315f656c6966)
>>>
>>> is that expected ?
>>
>> I expect the `pxar` binary you are using has the latest version? If 
>> so, then there is something off. Will double check, thx!
> 
> 
> yeah i built it freshly with the patches applied
> (also for the pxar crate)
> 
Had a closer look at this, the archive itself is just fine and the files 
can be restored without any problems when adding the payload input to a 
`pxar extract` command, so it seems rather to be a regression in the 
`pxar list`. I do however still have to figure out what the exact issue is.


_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel