From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 401F1D0FB
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:50:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 28C1D2886B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:50:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0F8232885D
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:50:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D18F040506
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:50:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1424ba39-b244-f0ca-fc51-fb0048892a8c@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:50:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/100.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
References: <20220413093005.61074-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220413093005.61074-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.042 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [drive.rs]
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] proxmox-tape: api:
 restore_key-code moved to tape-encryption-keys
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 07:50:53 -0000

On 13.04.22 11:30, Markus Frank wrote:
> The restore_key api-endpoint is tape/drive/{drive}/restore-key.
> Since I cannot set the url parameter for the drivename to null or
> undefined, when restoring by exported-key, I moved the 
> added restore_key-api-code to 
> "create_key aka POST api2/json/config/tape-encryption-keys" and
> added an ApiHandler call in the cli's "restore_key" to call
> "create_key" in the api.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/api2/config/tape_encryption_keys.rs | 39 ++++++++++++++++---
>  src/api2/tape/drive.rs                  | 51 +++++++------------------
>  src/bin/proxmox_tape/encryption_key.rs  | 19 ++++++---
>  3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!

Fixed the falsely required KDF param if a key was passed in a followup, together with some
cleanups.