From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE3460862 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:46:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9B7FC125D0 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:46:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C5282125C6 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:46:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8DC5C45C8F; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:46:01 +0100 (CET) To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com, Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> References: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com> <15f5893d-83cf-ee8c-11ff-0a67e376dc41@gmail.com> <9c0ceb9e-ff96-b12f-a4ed-1e1ac250fbb6@gmail.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <11d60eb0-9b17-53ba-cc21-79728e1296b0@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:46:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/83.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9c0ceb9e-ff96-b12f-a4ed-1e1ac250fbb6@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.083 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address GB_TO_NAME_FREEMAIL 0.01 Freemail spear phish with free mail KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Caution: ceph-mon service does not start after today's updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:46:03 -0000 On 26.11.20 15:15, Uwe Sauter wrote: > Am 26.11.20 um 15:10 schrieb Lindsay Mathieson: >> On 26/11/2020 10:18 pm, Uwe Sauter wrote: >>> this is a warning for all that are eager to apply today's updates. >>> In my case the ceph-mon@<host> service did not start after a reboot w= hich caused a hanging Ceph once the second monitoring service >>> went offline. >> >> I ran into that, also the node failed to rejoin the cluster quorum. sy= slog had errors relating to the pem-ssl key. >> >> Manually start the pve cluster service and a 2nd reboot solved both is= sues. >> >=20 > Yes, rebooting might help, but not reliably. I had nodes that needed se= veral reboots until pvestatd did not fail. >=20 > I also had failed ceph-mgr@<host> services (with Nautilus). >=20 > My current suspicion is that my network takes too long to become availa= ble. >=20 Note, it's always good idea to check if all services are running OK again= before continuing with upgrading the next host, not just on this update :-) Also, ceph monitors can be nicely restarted over the web interface, there= 's a visible status about which services run outdated versions/need a restart.= Anyway, do you have any logs which could give more details for possible i= ssues? regards, Thomas