From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A25691ADC
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:16:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4394FAD3B
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:16:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:16:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7F4B546FC7
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:16:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <10bae1e7-fdcc-9791-9df7-6f8a4da5dc79@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:16:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.0
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20230223152559.563428-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230223152559.563428-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.187 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] pvereport: add `date -R` to general
system info section
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 13:16:50 -0000
On 2/23/23 16:25, Lukas Wagner wrote:
> Sometimes it can be quite useful to know when exactly a system report
> was generated. Adds the following output quite prominently in the
> general system info section:
>
> # date -R
> Thu, 23 Feb 2023 16:21:12 +0100
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> PVE/Report.pm | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/Report.pm b/PVE/Report.pm
> index d363c15b..c9109dca 100644
> --- a/PVE/Report.pm
> +++ b/PVE/Report.pm
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ my $init_report_cmds = sub {
> order => 10,
> cmds => [
> 'hostname',
> + 'date -R',
> 'pveversion --verbose',
> 'cat /etc/hosts',
> 'pvesubscription get',
Ping. The same change was already merged into PBS and PMG, so it would be good to have it
in PVE system reports as well.
--
- Lukas