From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8CF61FF178 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:43:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 096E61BA48; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:43:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <0dc1a050-b1c0-463e-b362-4690db4b1dd4@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:43:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion , =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= References: <20251201113917.518311-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> <20251201113917.518311-3-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> <91f0954a-d4c6-43fb-9a52-3b5230e3eca4@proxmox.com> <63276a04-ac24-4d6f-a4e1-8a9b7c3e563d@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <63276a04-ac24-4d6f-a4e1-8a9b7c3e563d@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1764592984431 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [RFC datacenter-manager 2/3] api types: add new SubscriptionStatistics X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" On 12/1/25 1:39 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 01.12.25 um 13:36 schrieb Dominik Csapak: >> AFAICS this type is only ever used internally and never returned from the api, so IMHO there is no need to use the api macro here >> (or derive (de)serialize) > > Does not hurt though? And might be something that we could use for the always > displayed status in the main workspaces top-bar? > no, ofc not, just wanted to point it out that it does not do anything currently _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel