From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF68E73650
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:36:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D4FB31B9EE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:36:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BEBA11B9E1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:36:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 854E545AE5;
 Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:36:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <0d8fedef-a30f-119a-92a6-38cc09a47d83@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:36:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/88.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>,
 alexandre derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>
References: <20210413121640.3602975-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
 <c6e86b56-8a34-be5a-fc52-f6fae9c5cb67@odiso.com>
 <1618496842.5t56y2jruz.astroid@nora.none>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <1618496842.5t56y2jruz.astroid@nora.none>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.040 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC qemu-server++ 0/22] remote migration
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:36:50 -0000

On 15.04.21 16:32, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
>> I'll be able to test it soon as I'll need to migrate 200-300 vms betwe=
en=20
>> 2 datacenter soon.
> looking forward to feedback :) you'll need to put the=20
> proxmox-websocket-tunnel binary into $PATH of pveproxy/qm, after=20
> building it with 'cargo build'.

Just to be sure: ensure you build it with `cargo build --release` or else=20
it
may be quite slow