From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA08C9C090
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:11:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BA3B6113D5
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:11:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:11:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 067E044228
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:11:15 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <0d311efc-6b5b-48a0-8a63-cadc9d0453e0@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:11:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20231011140102.273423-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
 <20231011140102.273423-3-g.goller@proxmox.com>
 <f23e708d-5300-42c0-a778-7a088e2cda86@proxmox.com>
 <8ff66ba9-9b5f-444e-a380-98797ca5ba5b@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <8ff66ba9-9b5f-444e-a380-98797ca5ba5b@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.300 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox 2/2] proxmox-log: added tracing infra
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:11:45 -0000

On 10/23/23 10:56, Gabriel Goller wrote:

> [..]
> Sadly, we can't do that, because tracing only records the field names
> before enabling/disabling a layer (because of performance reasons,
> computing the value **could** be expensive).
>
Oops, Correction:
Tracing records the values of the fields **after** enabling/disabling 
layers. That's
why we don't have access to the values when creating a layerfilter.