From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B283C1FF17C for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:45:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DC635BD2A; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:46:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <06711a8b-4b02-4936-af7e-49087106c418@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:45:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Wolfgang Bumiller References: <20250611144903.200940-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com> <20250611144903.200940-7-f.schauer@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Filip Schauer In-Reply-To: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.013 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container v2 06/11] configure static IP in LXC config for custom entrypoint X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 25/06/2025 10:26, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote: > I think this should be handled with a separate key in the containers > network configuration. Maybe a "setup" property which defaults to > "container" and can be set to "host" (not sure if we ever need more, > if we know we don't, it could be a boolean...) I agree that checking the entrypoint directly in multiple places, to determine whether IP configuration should be managed by the host, is not ideal. But setting a property for every net[n] individually would also require us to set that property every time a network interface is added. So instead in v3 I added an "ipmanagehost" boolean directly to pct.conf. If we want we could still add a property to the network configuration that overrides this behaviour. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel